The welfare part of state services will pay the teenage girl to be a (mother?) with food stamps, a monthly check, and possible section 8 housing, along with socialized medicine known as Medicaid. There is no question as to if he wants to be the custodial parent of the child. There is just a demand that he be responsible with payments of money to the state office of support enforcement. She may be offered a welfare "JOBS" program, while he will not be allowed to be part of any "affirmative action" hiring program. He will later be called a..."Deadbeat Dad" for not paying his child support. She will be looked upon as a victim of circumstances. He will learn later in life that the state has scapegoated him for a socialist system that is designed to fail.
About this time in his life, the federal government may make itself known with a military obligation placed upon him and send him somewhere in the world to die. He may be told that he is sent out to defend the Constitution of the United States, however, that same constitution appears to be worthless in family courts of domestic relations. Here are a few examples:
She gets on welfare, using taxpayers' funds; he is not notified under "due process," and "equal treatment" before his child is placed on welfare, but he gets to pay.Our school system should be teaching young men social realities in America, and it should be of the utmost and paramount concern to the State and Federal Governments as young citizens are prepared for the future. Failure to teach reality is deceptive, and that is why some are beginning to call Washington D.C....the Deception Center.She calls the police to the family home for any reason; he goes to jail for no reason. (Again no "due process" or "equal treatment" under the law.)
He can be a working father, and able to keep his child off welfare in his custody, however, welfare agencies don't care, so instead they grant her administrative custody and make him pay.
He should be taught that most social programs in this country spend money for women, not for men.
He should be taught that the federal government will spend millions of dollars on crisis telephone lines and staffing for women, and nothing for men, as in the crime bill.
He should be taught that social "Welfare" programs are for women and her children, and not for men and his children.
He should be taught that the federal and state government will spend millions of dollars on the military or jails and prisons for men, but nothing for social help programs for men.
He should be taught that legislators use "two faced" language when preparing legislation in order to dupe the public into accepting the spending of tax dollars.
Email to the Editor